KG2PG

Q1: 1. In a conspiracy case under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, if one conspirator makes a statement, it is admissible against

Q2: 2. When can statements made by a conspirator be considered relevant under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q3: 3. In a real-life scenario, if two individuals plan a robbery and one of them later confesses to the police about the details of the crime, under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, can this statement be used as evidence against the other individual?

Q4: 4. Which of the following is NOT a requirement for the admissibility of statements made by a conspirator under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q5: 5. In a situation where a group of individuals conspire to commit a fraud, if one of them sends an email to the others outlining the fraudulent scheme, can this email be considered admissible evidence under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q6: 6. What is the significance of the phrase "in reference to common design" in Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q7: 7. Under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, if a conspirator makes a statement that incriminates another conspirator, who can object to the admissibility of that statement?

Q8: 8. Which of the following is true about the admissibility of statements made by a conspirator under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q9: 9. In a case where conspirators plan to commit a murder, if one of them is caught discussing the murder plan on a recorded phone call, can this phone call be considered admissible evidence under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q10: 10. Under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, what is the main purpose of admitting statements made by conspirators in reference to the common design?

Q11: 11. In a scenario where a group of individuals conspire to commit a cybercrime and one of them sends a text message detailing the hacking plan to the others, can this text message be considered admissible evidence under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q12: 12. What is the significance of the term "common design" in Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q13: 13. In a real-life scenario, if a group of individuals conspire to manufacture and distribute counterfeit goods, and one of them is caught discussing the production process with others, can this conversation be considered admissible evidence under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q14: 14. When considering the admissibility of statements made by conspirators under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, which factor is NOT relevant?

Q15: 15. In a case where a group of conspirators plan to commit a financial fraud, if one of them sends a voice message outlining the fraudulent activities to the others, can this voice message be considered admissible evidence under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q16: 16. Which of the following statements is true regarding the admissibility of statements made by conspirators under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q17: 17. In a real-life situation, if two individuals conspire to commit a burglary and one of them writes a letter detailing the target location and the plan, can this letter be considered admissible evidence under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q18: 18. What is the primary objective of admitting statements made by conspirators in reference to the common design under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q19: 19. In a case where a group of individuals conspire to commit a drug trafficking offense, if one of them sends a series of text messages discussing the distribution network to the others, can these text messages be considered admissible evidence under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q20: 20. Which of the following statements accurately describes the admissibility of statements made by conspirators under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q21: 21. In a real-life scenario, if a group of individuals conspire to commit a white-collar crime and one of them records a video confession implicating the others, can this video confession be considered admissible evidence under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q22: 22. Under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, what is the key factor that determines the admissibility of statements made by conspirators?

Q23: 23. Which of the following is NOT a consideration when determining the admissibility of statements made by conspirators under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q24: 24. In a situation where a group of individuals conspire to commit a corporate espionage offense, if one of them sends an email outlining the trade secret theft plan to the others, can this email be considered admissible evidence under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q25: 25. What impact does the admissibility of statements made by conspirators under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act have on the prosecution of conspiracy cases?

Score Summary