Q1: 1. In which situation does Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code allow for causing death in the right of private defence of the body?

• A) A) When there is no other means of escape
• B) B) When the aggressor is unarmed
• C) C) When the aggressor insults you verbally
• D) D) When the property is under threat

Q2: 2. If someone is being attacked and is cornered with no way to escape, can they use lethal force according to Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) Yes
• B) B) No
• C) C) Only if the attacker is armed
• D) D) Only if the attacker is physically stronger

Q3: 3. When can a person justify causing death in self-defence under Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) When they are defending their property
• B) B) When they are defending another person
• C) C) When there is a threat of serious harm or death
• D) D) When there is a minor verbal altercation

Q4: 4. According to Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code, what is important to consider before using lethal force in self-defence?

• A) A) The value of the property being defended
• B) B) The intention of the attacker
• C) C) The social status of the attacker
• D) D) The availability of weapons nearby

Q5: 5. If someone is being physically assaulted by an aggressor and fears for their life, can they cause death in self-defence as per Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) Only if the aggressor is armed
• B) B) Only if the aggressor is alone
• C) C) Yes, if there is no other way to save themselves
• D) D) No, it is never justified

Q6: 6. Under what circumstances can a person legally cause death in self-defence under Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) When there is a mere apprehension of danger
• B) B) When there is actual danger to life or limb
• C) C) When the attacker is a family member
• D) D) When the attacker is a minor

Q7: 7. Can a person invoke the right of private defence to cause death if they are not under immediate threat as per Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) Yes, if the attacker has a history of violence
• B) B) No, the threat must be immediate
• C) C) Only if the attacker is armed
• D) D) Only if the police are unreachable

Q8: 8. What is the primary consideration when deciding to cause death in self-defence under Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) The financial status of the attacker
• B) B) The nature and extent of the threat
• C) C) The age of the attacker
• D) D) The location of the incident

Q9: 9. If someone is being attacked by a group of individuals and fears for their life, can they use lethal force in self-defence according to Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) Only if they have a weapon
• B) B) Only if they are trained in self-defence
• C) C) Yes, to protect themselves from grave danger
• D) D) No, they should try to reason with the attackers

Q10: 10. According to Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code, what is the threshold for justifying the use of lethal force in self-defence?

• A) A) Any level of threat
• B) B) Imminent danger of death or grievous harm
• C) C) Verbal threats
• D) D) Property damage

Q11: 11. If someone is being attacked by an intoxicated person who is not in control of their actions, can lethal force be used in self-defence as per Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) Yes, to teach them a lesson
• B) B) No, as they are not in their right mind
• C) C) Only if the attacker is armed
• D) D) Only if the attacker is a stranger

Q12: 12. Under Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code, what must be present for the use of lethal force in self-defence to be considered justified?

• A) A) An audience witnessing the attack
• B) B) A warning given to the attacker
• C) C) Imminent danger of death or grievous harm
• D) D) A history of prior altercations

Q13: 13. Can a person claim the right of private defence to cause death if they provoke the attacker intentionally as per Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) Yes, to assert dominance
• B) B) No, self-defence is not applicable in such cases
• C) C) Only if the attacker is armed
• D) D) Only if there are no witnesses

Q14: 14. In a case where someone is being threatened with a knife by an assailant, can they use lethal force in self-defence according to Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) Only if they have a gun
• B) B) Only if they are a trained martial artist
• C) C) Yes, to protect themselves from grievous harm
• D) D) No, they should try to disarm the attacker

Q15: 15. What is the significance of the term "reasonable apprehension" in the context of Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) It refers to a fear of public embarrassment
• B) B) It signifies a genuine and rational fear of harm
• C) C) It indicates a fear of financial loss
• D) D) It implies a fear of legal consequences

Q16: 16. If someone is being physically assaulted but has the opportunity to escape without causing harm, can they use lethal force as per Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) Yes, to teach the attacker a lesson
• B) B) No, if escape is possible without violence
• C) C) Only if the attacker is armed
• D) D) Only if the attacker is physically stronger

Q17: 17. When can a person legally cause death in self-defence under Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) When they are defending their reputation
• B) B) When there is an immediate threat to life
• C) C) When there is a dispute over property
• D) D) When the attacker is a minor

Q18: 18. Can a person invoke the right of private defence to cause death if the threat is not imminent as per Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) Yes, if they have experienced trauma in the past
• B) B) No, the threat must be immediate
• C) C) Only if the attacker is armed
• D) D) Only if the police are unavailable

Q19: 19. What should an individual consider before resorting to causing death in self-defence under Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) The popularity of the attacker
• B) B) The size of the attacker
• C) C) The necessity and proportionality of the response
• D) D) The time of day

Q20: 20. If someone is being threatened with a firearm by an attacker, can they use lethal force in self-defence according to Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) Only if they have a weapon of equal caliber
• B) B) Only if they are a law enforcement officer
• C) C) Yes, to protect themselves from imminent danger
• D) D) No, they should try to negotiate with the attacker

Q21: 21. According to Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code, what is the primary consideration in determining the reasonableness of using lethal force in self-defence?

• A) A) The social status of the attacker
• B) B) The financial resources of the defender
• C) C) The nature and gravity of the threat
• D) D) The political affiliation of the parties involved

Q22: 22. Can a person claim the right of private defence to cause death if the attacker retreats during the confrontation as per Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) Yes, to assert dominance
• B) B) No, the threat must still be imminent
• C) C) Only if the attacker is a repeat offender
• D) D) Only if the attacker is a stranger

Q23: 23. In a situation where someone is being attacked with a deadly weapon and has the opportunity to call for help, can they use lethal force in self-defence according to Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) Only if they have a personal bodyguard
• B) B) Only if they are skilled in negotiation tactics
• C) C) Yes, to prevent grave harm or death
• D) D) No, they should prioritize seeking assistance

Q24: 24. What is the role of proportionality in determining the use of lethal force in self-defence under Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) Unimportant, as any force can be justified
• B) B) Essential to ensure the response matches the threat
• C) C) Relevant only if the attacker is physically stronger
• D) D) Relevant only if the attacker is armed

Q25: 25. If someone is being attacked by multiple aggressors and has no means of escape, can they cause death in self-defence according to Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code?

• A) A) Only if they have a weapon for each attacker
• B) B) Only if they are a trained combatant
• C) C) Yes, to protect themselves from imminent danger
• D) D) No, they should attempt to reason with the attackers