Q1: 1. In which section of the Indian Penal Code 1860 is the right of private defence against deadly assault when there is a risk of harm to an innocent person addressed?

• A) A) Section 100
• B) B) Section 104
• C) C) Section 106
• D) D) Section 110

Q2: 2. When can a person exercise the right of private defence against a deadly assault to protect an innocent person?

• A) A) Only if the innocent person is a family member
• B) B) Only if the innocent person is a minor
• C) C) Only if there is a risk of harm to the innocent person
• D) D) Only if the innocent person is wealthy

Q3: 3. What is the primary consideration when determining whether the right of private defence can be exercised against a deadly assault to protect an innocent person?

• A) A) Gender of the innocent person
• B) B) Age of the innocent person
• C) C) Social status of the innocent person
• D) D) Risk of harm to the innocent person

Q4: 4. A real-life scenario: If a person sees an armed individual threatening to harm a child with a knife, can they exercise the right of private defence under Section 106?

• A) A) Yes, because the child is defenseless
• B) B) Yes, because there is a risk of harm to the child
• C) C) No, because the person is not related to the child
• D) D) No, because the child's actions provoked the attacker

Q5: 5. What should a person consider before using force in defence of an innocent person under Section 106?

• A) A) The financial background of the innocent person
• B) B) Whether the attacker is known to the innocent person
• C) C) The immediacy and necessity of the situation
• D) D) The popularity of the innocent person in society

Q6: 6. In a situation where there is a risk of harm to an innocent person due to a deadly assault, which of the following is true regarding the exercise of the right of private defence under Section 106?

• A) A) It can be exercised only during daytime
• B) B) It can be exercised even if there are other non-violent means available
• C) C) It can be exercised without considering the consequences
• D) D) It can be exercised without assessing the gravity of the harm

Q7: 7. Consider this scenario: A person witnesses a group of individuals attacking an innocent bystander with lethal weapons. Can the witness invoke the right of private defence under Section 106?

• A) A) No, because there are multiple attackers
• B) B) Yes, because the bystander is outnumbered
• C) C) No, because the bystander is not known to the witness
• D) D) Yes, because there is a risk of harm to the innocent bystander

Q8: 8. What factors should be taken into account before using force to defend an innocent person under Section 106?

• A) A) The political affiliation of the innocent person
• B) B) The possible consequences of not intervening
• C) C) The attire of the innocent person
• D) D) The educational background of the innocent person

Q9: 9. If a person uses excessive force while defending an innocent individual under Section 106, what legal consequences could they face?

• A) A) No consequences, as it was done to protect an innocent person
• B) B) Civil liability for damages caused
• C) C) Criminal charges for assault
• D) D) Award for bravery from the government

Q10: 10. A real-life scenario: If a person intervenes to defend an innocent person against a deadly assault and unintentionally causes harm to the attacker, can they still claim the right of private defence under Section 106?

• A) A) No, because harm was caused to the attacker
• B) B) Yes, because the primary intention was to protect the innocent person
• C) C) No, because the person is not trained in self-defence
• D) D) Yes, because the attacker deserved the harm

Q11: 11. When can the right of private defence against a deadly assault to protect an innocent person be invoked under Section 106?

• A) A) Only in cases of property theft
• B) B) Only in cases of verbal threats
• C) C) Only in cases of physical harm
• D) D) Only when there is a reasonable apprehension of harm

Q12: 12. In a situation where there is an immediate threat of harm to an innocent person, what should a person consider before using force under Section 106?

• A) A) The nationality of the innocent person
• B) B) The emotional state of the attacker
• C) C) The proportionality of the force used
• D) D) The social media following of the innocent person

Q13: 13. Consider this scenario: A person witnesses a known criminal attempting to harm an innocent child. Can the witness exercise the right of private defence under Section 106?

• A) A) Yes, because the criminal has a history of violence
• B) B) Yes, because the child is defenseless
• C) C) No, because the criminal is known to the witness
• D) D) No, because the child's parents are not present

Q14: 14. What should be the guiding principle when assessing the necessity of using force to defend an innocent person under Section 106?

• A) A) The popularity of the innocent person
• B) B) The urgency of the situation
• C) C) The financial status of the innocent person
• D) D) The ethnicity of the innocent person

Q15: 15. In a situation where there is a risk of harm to an innocent person from a deadly assault, what should a person prioritize when deciding to intervene under Section 106?

• A) A) Their own safety
• B) B) The legal consequences of intervention
• C) C) The gender of the innocent person
• D) D) The timely protection of the innocent person

Q16: 16. A real-life scenario: If a person hesitates to intervene in a deadly assault against an innocent person due to fear of legal repercussions, which section of the Indian Penal Code can provide guidance?

• A) A) Section 96
• B) B) Section 106
• C) C) Section 112
• D) D) Section 118

Q17: 17. What should a person do if they witness a deadly assault on an innocent person but are unsure about the extent of force they can use under Section 106?

• A) A) Immediately use lethal force to deter the attacker
• B) B) Call the police and wait for their arrival
• C) C) Consult legal experts before taking any action
• D) D) Ignore the situation and walk away

Q18: 18. When does the right of private defence against a deadly assault to protect an innocent person cease under Section 106?

• A) A) When the attacker surrenders
• B) B) When the innocent person leaves the scene
• C) C) When the attacker is no longer a threat
• D) D) When the police arrive at the scene

Q19: 19. In a situation where a person uses force to defend an innocent individual under Section 106, what should they be prepared to justify?

• A) A) Their political beliefs
• B) B) Their physical strength
• C) C) The necessity and proportionality of their actions
• D) D) Their professional occupation

Q20: 20. Consider this scenario: A person observes an individual being verbally abusive towards an innocent elderly person. Can the observer exercise the right of private defence under Section 106?

• A) A) Yes, because verbal abuse can escalate to physical harm
• B) B) No, because the elderly person should handle it themselves
• C) C) Yes, if the observer is related to the elderly person
• D) D) No, because verbal abuse is not a deadly assault

Q21: 21. What should a person do if they witness a deadly assault against an innocent person but are physically incapable of intervening under Section 106?

• A) A) Record the incident and post it on social media
• B) B) Seek help from nearby individuals
• C) C) Ignore the situation and avoid involvement
• D) D) Wait for the police to arrive before taking any action

Q22: 22. In a situation where there is a risk of harm to an innocent person from a deadly assault, what should a person consider before deciding to intervene under Section 106?

• A) A) The innocent person's religious beliefs
• B) B) The attacker's social status
• C) C) The availability of medical assistance
• D) D) The potential consequences of inaction

Q23: 23. A real-life scenario: If a person uses force to defend an innocent person against a deadly assault and the innocent person later denies needing any help, can the defender still justify their actions under Section 106?

• A) A) No, because the innocent person's denial weakens the case
• B) B) Yes, because the defender acted based on perceived risk
• C) C) No, because the defender should have sought consent first
• D) D) Yes, if the defender is a trained professional

Q24: 24. What should a person do if they witness a deadly assault against an innocent person but are unsure about the legal boundaries of intervention under Section 106?

• A) A) Seek guidance from legal authorities
• B) B) Immediately intervene without hesitation
• C) C) Assess the situation from a safe distance
• D) D) Leave the scene and avoid getting involved

Q25: 25. When assessing the risk of harm to an innocent person in a situation involving a deadly assault, what should a person prioritize before deciding to intervene under Section 106?

• A) A) The potential impact on their reputation
• B) B) The presence of bystanders at the scene
• C) C) The urgency of protecting the innocent person
• D) D) The financial compensation for intervention