KG2PG

Q1: 1. In the context of Section 116 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, an inquiry as to the truth of information is conducted by

Q2: 2. When can an inquiry as to the truth of information be initiated under Section 116?

Q3: 3. Which of the following is NOT a purpose of conducting an inquiry as to the truth of information under Section 116?

Q4: 4. In a real-life scenario, if a complainant provides false information to the police leading to the arrest of an innocent person, which section of the CrPC can be invoked for an inquiry into the truth of information?

Q5: 5. Who has the authority to order an inquiry as to the truth of information under Section 116?

Q6: 6. In a case where conflicting information is presented by the complainant and the accused, what action can the court take under Section 116?

Q7: 7. Which of the following is a safeguard provided by Section 116 to prevent wrongful arrests and proceedings?

Q8: 8. In a situation where the police file a charge sheet based on false information, what recourse does the accused have under Section 116?

Q9: 9. How does Section 116 contribute to maintaining law and order by ensuring the veracity of information provided in criminal cases?

Q10: 10. Under Section 116, what action can be taken if the court finds the information provided to be false and malicious?

Q11: 11. In a situation where the accused challenges the authenticity of the evidence presented by the prosecution, how can Section 116 be invoked to address this issue?

Q12: 12. If a witness provides conflicting statements during the course of a trial, which provision of the CrPC can be utilized to ascertain the truth?

Q13: 13. What action can the court take if it suspects that the complainant is providing false information to manipulate the legal process?

Q14: 14. In a case where the accused alleges that the evidence against them has been fabricated, how can Section 116 assist in verifying the truth?

Q15: 15. Which of the following is a key principle underlying the provision of Section 116 in the CrPC?

Q16: 16. When can a court exercise its power under Section 116 to inquire into the truth of information provided in a case?

Q17: 17. In a case where the accused challenges the veracity of the witness statements presented by the prosecution, how can Section 116 aid in resolving this dispute?

Q18: 18. How does Section 116 help in upholding the principles of natural justice and fairness in criminal proceedings?

Q19: 19. If the court finds discrepancies in the evidence presented by both parties in a criminal case, what course of action can be taken under Section 116?

Q20: 20. Which of the following is a factor considered by the court when deciding whether to initiate an inquiry under Section 116?

Q21: 21. In a scenario where the police fail to conduct a proper investigation and submit a flawed charge sheet, how can Section 116 be utilized to rectify this error?

Q22: 22. How does Section 116 safeguard the rights of the accused and prevent miscarriage of justice in criminal cases?

Q23: 23. What role does the principle of audi alteram partem play in the context of Section 116 of the CrPC?

Q24: 24. In a case where the accused raises doubts about the authenticity of the evidence presented by the prosecution, how can Section 116 assist in resolving this dispute?

Q25: 25. How does the provision of Section 116 contribute to maintaining the rule of law and ensuring the proper administration of justice in society?

Score Summary