Q1: 1. In which section of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 is the provision for the power to order cases to be tried in different sessions divisions?

• A) A) Section 185
• B) B) Section 200
• C) C) Section 300
• D) D) Section 400

Q2: 2. When can the court exercise the power to order cases to be tried in different sessions divisions?

• A) A) When the accused requests it
• B) B) When it is in the interest of justice
• C) C) When the prosecutor demands it
• D) D) When the judge is absent

Q3: 3. What is the purpose of allowing cases to be tried in different sessions divisions?

• A) A) To delay the trial process
• B) B) To expedite the trial process
• C) C) To confuse the accused
• D) D) To increase court expenses

Q4: 4. Who has the authority to order cases to be tried in different sessions divisions?

• A) A) Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
• B) B) District Judge
• C) C) Sessions Judge
• D) D) Police Officer

Q5: 5. Which of the following is NOT a factor considered when ordering cases to be tried in different sessions divisions?

• A) A) Convenience of witnesses
• B) B) Complexities of the case
• C) C) Availability of the accused
• D) D) Political affiliation of the accused

Q6: 6. In a murder case where the witnesses are located in different districts, the court may order the trial to be held in

• A) A) The district of the accused's residence
• B) B) The district of the crime scene
• C) C) A district where witnesses are located
• D) D) The district with the highest crime rate

Q7: 7. Which section of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 empowers the court to transfer cases for trial in different sessions divisions?

• A) A) Section 185
• B) B) Section 150
• C) C) Section 250
• D) D) Section 350

Q8: 8. If a key witness is unable to travel to the original trial location, the court may order the trial to be conducted in a different sessions division for the

• A) A) Convenience of the accused
• B) B) Convenience of the witness
• C) C) Convenience of the judge
• D) D) Convenience of the prosecutor

Q9: 9. What is the main consideration for the court when deciding to order a trial in a different sessions division?

• A) A) Population density of the district
• B) B) Availability of courthouses
• C) C) Convenience and interests of justice
• D) D) Political climate of the region

Q10: 10. When a case involves multiple accused residing in different districts, the court may order the trial to be conducted in

• A) A) The district of the first accused
• B) B) A district convenient to all accused
• C) C) The district with the most severe penalties
• D) D) The district with the highest conviction rate

Q11: 11. In a financial fraud case involving transactions across multiple states, the court may order the trial to be held in a different sessions division to

• A) A) Simplify the legal process
• B) B) Increase the burden on the accused
• C) C) Avoid jurisdictional conflicts
• D) D) Delay the proceedings

Q12: 12. If a case involves sensitive political issues, the court may order the trial to be conducted in a different sessions division to

• A) A) Ensure media coverage
• B) B) Protect the accused
• C) C) Maintain public order
• D) D) Increase public interest

Q13: 13. When a case involves witnesses who fear for their safety in the original trial location, the court may order the trial to be held in a different sessions division for

• A) A) Protection of witnesses
• B) B) Convenience of the accused
• C) C) Avoiding public scrutiny
• D) D) Delaying the trial

Q14: 14. In a case where the accused is a public figure and there are concerns about bias in the original trial location, the court may order the trial to be conducted in a different sessions division to

• A) A) Ensure a fair trial
• B) B) Increase media attention
• C) C) Protect the accused's reputation
• D) D) Delay the proceedings

Q15: 15. If a case involves evidence that is difficult to transport to the original trial location, the court may order the trial to be held in a different sessions division for

• A) A) Convenience of the prosecutor
• B) B) Convenience of the defense
• C) C) Preservation of evidence
• D) D) Delaying the trial

Q16: 16. When a case involves technical experts who are only available in specific districts, the court may order the trial to be conducted in a different sessions division for

• A) A) Convenience of the judge
• B) B) Speeding up the trial
• C) C) Availability of expertise
• D) D) Increasing court expenses

Q17: 17. In a case where the accused is a minor and the original trial location lacks appropriate facilities for juvenile proceedings, the court may order the trial to be held in a different sessions division for

• A) A) Convenience of the accused
• B) B) Protection of the minor's rights
• C) C) Avoiding media attention
• D) D) Delaying the trial

Q18: 18. If a case involves a large number of witnesses whose testimonies need to be recorded in a specific manner, the court may order the trial to be conducted in a different sessions division for

• A) A) Simplifying the proceedings
• B) B) Ensuring accurate record-keeping
• C) C) Avoiding witness intimidation
• D) D) Increasing court workload

Q19: 19. When a case involves multiple legal complexities that require specialized judicial knowledge, the court may order the trial to be held in a different sessions division to

• A) A) Confuse the accused
• B) B) Expedite the legal process
• C) C) Ensure fair legal interpretation
• D) D) Delay the proceedings

Q20: 20. In a case where the victim's family resides in a different state and prefers the trial to be conducted there, the court may order the trial to be conducted in a different sessions division to

• A) A) Reduce court expenses
• B) B) Accommodate the victim's family
• C) C) Increase witness credibility
• D) D) Delay the trial

Q21: 21. If a case involves conflicting laws across different states, the court may order the trial to be conducted in a different sessions division to

• A) A) Ensure consistency in legal interpretation
• B) B) Delay the proceedings
• C) C) Increase legal complexity
• D) D) Avoid jurisdictional issues

Q22: 22. When a case involves multiple accused who have varying health conditions, the court may order the trial to be held in a different sessions division for

• A) A) Convenience of the accused
• B) B) Ensuring proper medical care
• C) C) Increasing court workload
• D) D) Delaying the trial

Q23: 23. In a case where the accused's safety is at risk in the original trial location, the court may order the trial to be conducted in a different sessions division for

• A) A) Protection of the accused
• B) B) Convenience of the prosecutor
• C) C) Avoiding witness intimidation
• D) D) Delaying the legal process

Q24: 24. If a case involves evidence that is perishable and needs immediate analysis, the court may order the trial to be held in a different sessions division for

• A) A) Avoiding public scrutiny
• B) B) Preservation of evidence
• C) C) Convenience of the judge
• D) D) Delaying the proceedings

Q25: 25. When a case involves national security implications, the court may order the trial to be conducted in a different sessions division to

• A) A) Protect state secrets
• B) B) Increase media attention
• C) C) Expedite the trial process
• D) D) Delay the proceedings