KG2PG

Q1: 1. Which section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 deals with admissions by persons whose position must be proved as against a party to suit?

Q2: 2. In a legal dispute, if a person admits to holding a particular position, under which section can such an admission be used as evidence against that person?

Q3: 3. A admits to being the managing director of a company. In a subsequent court case, this admission by A can be used as evidence against him under which section?

Q4: 4. When can admissions by a person regarding their position be considered relevant under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

Q5: 5. X admits to being the owner of a property in a legal document. Can this admission by X be used as evidence against him in a property dispute?

Q6: 6. In a case involving the ownership of a car, if the defendant admits to being the registered owner of the vehicle, which section of the Indian Evidence Act allows this admission to be used against them?

Q7: 7. Under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, admissions by a person about their position are relevant when

Q8: 8. A confesses to being the driver in a hit-and-run accident. Can this admission be used against A in a court of law under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q9: 9. Under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act, an admission by a person about their position can be used against them

Q10: 10. If a witness admits to being present at the scene of a crime, under which section of the Indian Evidence Act can this admission be used against them?

Q11: 11. A admits to being the landlord of a property in a tenancy dispute. Can this admission be considered as evidence against A under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q12: 12. Under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act, an admission by a person about their position is relevant when

Q13: 13. If a defendant admits to being the CEO of a company in a fraud case, can this admission be used as evidence against them under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q14: 14. In a property dispute, if A admits to being the rightful owner of the disputed property, under which section of the Indian Evidence Act can this admission be used as evidence against A?

Q15: 15. When can an admission by a person about their position be considered relevant under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q16: 16. In a case involving a dispute over an inheritance, if a person admits to being the legal heir, can this admission be used as evidence against them under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q17: 17. Under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act, an admission by a person about their position is relevant when

Q18: 18. If a defendant admits to being the owner of a weapon used in a crime, can this admission be used as evidence against them under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q19: 19. In a case involving a breach of contract, if a party admits to being the signatory of the contract, can this admission be used as evidence against them under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q20: 20. Under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act, an admission by a person about their position can be used against them

Q21: 21. If a defendant admits to being the driver in a car accident case, can this admission be used as evidence against them under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q22: 22. A confesses to being the employer of the victim in a workplace injury case. Can this admission be used against A in court under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q23: 23. In a case involving a dispute over intellectual property rights, if a party admits to being the inventor of a patented technology, can this admission be used as evidence against them under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Q24: 24. Under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act, an admission by a person about their position is relevant when

Q25: 25. If a defendant admits to being the project manager in a construction dispute, can this admission be used as evidence against them under Section 19 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Score Summary