Q1: 1. In the context of Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act, an admission made by a party to a civil case is relevant when it is

• A) A) Made under coercion
• B) B) Made by a third party
• C) C) Against the party making it
• D) D) Not signed by the party

Q2: 2. Which of the following statements is true regarding admissions in civil cases under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act?

• A) A) Admissions must be made in writing to be relevant
• B) B) Admissions made in criminal cases are also relevant in civil cases
• C) C) Admissions may be oral or in writing
• D) D) Admissions are only relevant if made in open court

Q3: 3. In a civil case, an admission is relevant under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act when it is made by

• A) A) A witness
• B) B) A lawyer
• C) C) A judge
• D) D) A party to the case

Q4: 4. When can an admission in a civil case be considered relevant under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act?

• A) A) If it is made after the case is closed
• B) B) If it is made by a minor
• C) C) If it is made by a person of unsound mind
• D) D) If it is made by a competent party

Q5: 5. Which of the following scenarios represents a relevant admission in a civil case according to Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act?

• A) A) A party admitting to a fact that goes against their interest
• B) B) A party admitting to a fact after the case is concluded
• C) C) A party admitting to a fact that was coerced
• D) D) A party admitting to a fact anonymously

Q6: 6. Under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act, an admission in a civil case can be used as evidence if it is

• A) A) Made in a private conversation
• B) B) Made by a non-party witness
• C) C) Made with the intention to deceive
• D) D) Made by the party against their own interest

Q7: 7. A real-life scenario where an admission in a civil case would be relevant under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act is

• A) A) A defendant admitting to owing money to the plaintiff
• B) B) A witness making a statement in favor of the defendant
• C) C) A party denying all allegations made against them
• D) D) A lawyer admitting to withholding evidence

Q8: 8. In the context of Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act, an admission in a civil case is considered relevant when it is

• A) A) Made under duress
• B) B) Made by a minor
• C) C) Made voluntarily by a competent party
• D) D) Made by a judge in the case

Q9: 9. Which of the following best describes the relevance of an admission in a civil case as per Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act?

• A) A) It must be made in writing to be admissible
• B) B) It must be made in open court to be relevant
• C) C) It can be used against the party making it
• D) D) It can only be made by a legal representative

Q10: 10. An admission in a civil case is considered relevant under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act when it is

• A) A) Made by a witness
• B) B) Made by a party to the case
• C) C) Made after the case is concluded
• D) D) Made by a non-competent party

Q11: 11. In a civil case, which of the following statements is true regarding the relevance of an admission under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act?

• A) A) Admissions are only relevant if made in writing
• B) B) Admissions must be made by a lawyer to be admissible
• C) C) Admissions can be oral or in writing
• D) D) Admissions are only relevant if made in the presence of a judge

Q12: 12. When can an admission in a civil case be considered relevant under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act?

• A) A) If it is made under threat of physical harm
• B) B) If it is made by a party to the case
• C) C) If it is made anonymously
• D) D) If it is made by a minor

Q13: 13. Which of the following scenarios represents a relevant admission in a civil case according to Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act?

• A) A) A party admitting to a fact that benefits them
• B) B) A witness changing their statement multiple times
• C) C) A party refusing to admit to any facts
• D) D) A party admitting to a fact against their interest

Q14: 14. Under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act, an admission in a civil case can be used as evidence if it is

• A) A) Made in a private diary entry
• B) B) Made by a non-party outsider
• C) C) Made with the intention to mislead
• D) D) Made by the party in favor of their case

Q15: 15. A real-life scenario where an admission in a civil case would be relevant under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act is

• A) A) A defendant admitting to not knowing the plaintiff
• B) B) A witness making a statement against the plaintiff
• C) C) A party admitting to a breach of contract
• D) D) A lawyer withholding critical evidence

Q16: 16. In the context of Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act, an admission in a civil case is considered relevant when it is

• A) A) Made under pressure from family
• B) B) Made by a minor
• C) C) Made voluntarily by a competent party
• D) D) Made by a judge in the case

Q17: 17. Which of the following best describes the relevance of an admission in a civil case as per Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act?

• A) A) It must be made in public to be admissible
• B) B) It must be made by a party's legal representative
• C) C) It can be used against the party making it
• D) D) It can only be made by a party's family member

Q18: 18. An admission in a civil case is considered relevant under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act when it is

• A) A) Made by a non-competent party
• B) B) Made by a party to the case
• C) C) Made after the case is concluded
• D) D) Made by a witness

Q19: 19. In a civil case, which of the following statements is true regarding the relevance of an admission under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act?

• A) A) Admissions must be made in writing to be relevant
• B) B) Admissions must be made by a judge to be admissible
• C) C) Admissions can be oral or in writing
• D) D) Admissions are only relevant if made in the presence of a jury

Q20: 20. When can an admission in a civil case be considered relevant under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act?

• A) A) If it is made under threat of legal action
• B) B) If it is made by a party to the case
• C) C) If it is made anonymously
• D) D) If it is made by a minor

Q21: 21. Which of the following scenarios represents a relevant admission in a civil case according to Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act?

• A) A) A party admitting to a fact that strengthens their case
• B) B) A witness refusing to provide any information
• C) C) A party denying all allegations made against them
• D) D) A party admitting to a fact against their interest

Q22: 22. Under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act, an admission in a civil case can be used as evidence if it is

• A) A) Made in a private email
• B) B) Made by a non-party acquaintance
• C) C) Made with the intention to confuse
• D) D) Made by the party in favor of their case

Q23: 23. A real-life scenario where an admission in a civil case would be relevant under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act is

• A) A) A defendant admitting to not being present at the scene of the incident
• B) B) A witness making a statement without any knowledge of the case
• C) C) A party admitting to a breach of contract
• D) D) A lawyer refusing to disclose relevant documents

Q24: 24. In the context of Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act, an admission in a civil case is considered relevant when it is

• A) A) Made under external influence
• B) B) Made by a minor
• C) C) Made voluntarily by a competent party
• D) D) Made by a judge in the case

Q25: 25. Which of the following best describes the relevance of an admission in a civil case as per Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act?

• A) A) It must be made in public to be admissible
• B) B) It must be made by a party's legal advisor
• C) C) It can be used against the party making it
• D) D) It can only be made by a party's close friend