KG2PG

Q1: 1. In the context of Section 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, when a person is convicted of several offences at one trial, what should the court consider for awarding sentence?

Q2: 2. A real-life scenario: If a person is found guilty of both theft and assault in the same trial, how should the court determine the sentence according to Section 31?

Q3: 3. According to Section 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, what plays a crucial role in determining the sentence in cases of conviction of several offences at one trial?

Q4: 4. When a person is convicted of multiple offences at one trial, what is the primary focus of the court while deciding the sentence as per Section 31?

Q5: 5. In a case where an individual is convicted of different offences in a single trial, what must the court consider while awarding the sentence under Section 31?

Q6: 6. How does Section 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 ensure fair sentencing in cases involving multiple offences at one trial?

Q7: 7. When a person faces convictions for several offences in a single trial, what aspect should the court primarily consider for sentencing under Section 31?

Q8: 8. In cases where multiple offences are committed by an individual at one trial, what principle guides the court in determining the appropriate sentence according to Section 31?

Q9: 9. A practical scenario: If a defendant is convicted of fraud and forgery in the same trial, which factor is crucial for the court to consider while sentencing under Section 31?

Q10: 10. How does Section 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 address the sentencing complexity in cases involving convictions for multiple offences?

Q11: 11. In situations where an individual is found guilty of various crimes at one trial, what factor should the court consider while applying Section 31 for sentencing?

Q12: 12. When determining the sentence for multiple convictions at one trial as per Section 31, what is the court's primary focus?

Q13: 13. In the context of Section 31, what should the court consider regarding the accused's multiple convictions at one trial?

Q14: 14. How does Section 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 prevent unfair sentencing in cases involving convictions for multiple offences at one trial?

Q15: 15. When a person is convicted of several offences at one trial, what should the court avoid while applying Section 31 for sentencing?

Q16: 16. In cases involving convictions for multiple offences at one trial, why is it important for the court to consider the totality of criminal conduct as per Section 31?

Q17: 17. When applying Section 31 in cases of conviction of several offences at one trial, what factor should the court primarily focus on for sentencing?

Q18: 18. In a scenario where an individual is convicted of multiple offences in a single trial, what principle guides the court under Section 31 for determining the sentence?

Q19: 19. How does Section 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 ensure consistency in sentencing for multiple convictions at one trial?

Q20: 20. When a person is found guilty of various offences in a single trial, what aspect should the court prioritize while applying Section 31 for sentencing?

Q21: 21. In cases involving convictions for multiple offences at one trial, why is it essential for the court to consider the overall impact of all offences according to Section 31?

Q22: 22. When determining the sentence for multiple convictions at one trial under Section 31, what factor should the court primarily focus on?

Q23: 23. In the context of Section 31, why is it important for the court to consider the seriousness of all offences committed by the accused in a single trial?

Q24: 24. When applying Section 31 in cases of conviction of several offences at one trial, what should the court avoid while determining the sentence?

Q25: 25. In a scenario where an individual is convicted of multiple offences in a single trial, what principle does Section 31 emphasize for determining the appropriate sentence?

Score Summary