KG2PG

Q1: 1. In a criminal trial under Section 315 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, who can be considered a competent witness?

Q2: 2. What is the significance of an accused person being a competent witness under Section 315 of the CrPC 1973?

Q3: 3. In a real-life scenario, if the accused person chooses to testify under Section 315, what must they do before taking the stand?

Q4: 4. How does the provision of Section 315 in the CrPC 1973 ensure fairness in criminal trials?

Q5: 5. What happens if the accused person refuses to testify as a witness under Section 315 in a criminal trial?

Q6: 6. Which of the following statements is true regarding the competency of an accused person as a witness under Section 315?

Q7: 7. In a real-life problem, if the accused person chooses to be a witness under Section 315, what rights do they have during the trial?

Q8: 8. How does the provision of Section 315 protect the rights of the accused person in a criminal trial?

Q9: 9. What is the primary objective of Section 315 in the CrPC 1973 with regard to the accused person being a competent witness?

Q10: 10. In a practical scenario, if the accused person's testimony under Section 315 contradicts their earlier statements, what implications does this have on the trial?

Q11: 11. Which of the following best describes the role of the accused person as a witness in a criminal trial under Section 315?

Q12: 12. In a real-life problem, if the accused person provides crucial evidence in their defense under Section 315, how does this impact the burden of proof in the trial?

Q13: 13. What safeguards are in place to prevent the misuse of the accused person's testimony under Section 315 in the CrPC 1973?

Q14: 14. How does the provision of Section 315 ensure transparency and accountability in criminal trials involving the accused person as a witness?

Q15: 15. In a practical scenario, if the accused person becomes emotional or agitated while testifying under Section 315, what actions can the court take?

Q16: 16. What legal consequences can the accused person face if they provide false testimony under Section 315 in a criminal trial?

Q17: 17. How does the competency of the accused person as a witness under Section 315 impact the overall credibility of the trial proceedings?

Q18: 18. In a real-life problem, if the accused person chooses not to testify under Section 315, what implications does this have on their defense?

Q19: 19. Which of the following rights is afforded to the accused person when testifying as a witness under Section 315?

Q20: 20. In a practical scenario, if the accused person's testimony conflicts with physical evidence presented in court, how will the court likely resolve this discrepancy?

Q21: 21. What measures can be taken to ensure that the accused person's testimony under Section 315 is not coerced or influenced?

Q22: 22. Which of the following statements is true regarding the admissibility of the accused person's testimony under Section 315?

Q23: 23. In a real-life problem, if the accused person chooses to testify under Section 315 and their testimony conflicts with statements made during interrogation, how will the court view this discrepancy?

Q24: 24. How does the provision of Section 315 protect the rights of the accused person in terms of self-incrimination in a criminal trial?

Q25: 25. What role does the judge play in overseeing the testimony of the accused person under Section 315 in a criminal trial?

Score Summary