Q1: 1. In which of the following scenarios is a statement made by a person who is now deceased deemed relevant under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) When the statement is made to a police officer
• B) B) When the statement is made to a medical practitioner
• C) C) When the statement is made in the course of business
• D) D) When the statement is made in a private conversation

Q2: 2. What type of statement made by a deceased person can be admissible as evidence under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Any statement made at any time
• B) B) Only statements made in anticipation of death
• C) C) Only statements made in the presence of family members
• D) D) Only statements made under oath in court

Q3: 3. In a real-life scenario, if a person who witnessed a crime is now deceased, under what circumstance can their statement be considered relevant under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) If the statement was made to a close friend
• B) B) If the statement was made to a neighbor
• C) C) If the statement was made to a doctor while receiving treatment
• D) D) If the statement was made in front of a large gathering

Q4: 4. Which of the following is NOT a requirement for a statement made by a deceased person to be admissible under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) The statement must relate to the cause of death
• B) B) The statement must be relevant to the matter in issue
• C) C) The statement must be made to a police officer
• D) D) The statement must be made by a person who cannot be found

Q5: 5. If a person who is now missing made a statement that is relevant to a legal dispute, under what condition can that statement be considered admissible under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) The person must have been missing for at least 3 years
• B) B) The person must have been missing for at least 7 years
• C) C) The person must have been missing for at least 2 years
• D) D) The person must have left the country

Q6: 6. In a case where a person is declared legally dead due to being missing for over 7 years, what type of statement made by that person can be admissible under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Only statements made to family members
• B) B) Only statements made in a public gathering
• C) C) Only statements made to legal authorities
• D) D) Any relevant statement made by the person

Q7: 7. If a person who is now deceased made a statement to their lawyer regarding a property dispute, can that statement be considered relevant under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Yes, because it was made to a legal professional
• B) B) No, because it was not made in anticipation of death
• C) C) Yes, if the lawyer is willing to testify in court
• D) D) No, because it was a private conversation

Q8: 8. When can a statement made by a person who is mentally incapacitated and unable to testify be admissible under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Only if the person's condition is temporary
• B) B) Only if the person has a history of mental illness
• C) C) Only if the person is under the age of 18
• D) D) Only if the person cannot be found

Q9: 9. If a person who is now deceased made a statement to their spouse about witnessing a crime, can that statement be considered relevant under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Yes, if the spouse is willing to testify in court
• B) B) No, because it was a private conversation
• C) C) Yes, if the statement was made in a public place
• D) D) No, because it was not made in anticipation of death

Q10: 10. In a situation where a person who is now deceased made a statement to a priest during confession, can that statement be admitted as evidence under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Yes, because of the confidentiality of the confession
• B) B) No, because religious confessions are not legally binding
• C) C) Yes, if the priest is subpoenaed to testify in court
• D) D) No, because the statement was made in private

Q11: 11. What is the significance of the statement being made by a person who is now dead or cannot be found in the context of Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) It allows for hearsay evidence to be admitted in court
• B) B) It provides an exception to the rule against hearsay evidence
• C) C) It only applies to criminal cases
• D) D) It is not considered as evidence in legal proceedings

Q12: 12. Under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, in which of the following scenarios can a statement made by a person who is now deceased be admissible as evidence?

• A) A) If the statement was made to a journalist
• B) B) If the statement was made in a private diary
• C) C) If the statement was made to a neighbor
• D) D) If the statement was made during a public speech

Q13: 13. If a person who is now deceased made a statement to their accountant about their financial affairs, can that statement be considered relevant under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Yes, if the accountant is a court-appointed official
• B) B) No, because it was a professional conversation
• C) C) Yes, if the statement was made in anticipation of death
• D) D) No, because financial matters are not covered under Section 32

Q14: 14. In a real-life scenario involving a missing person, if a statement made by that person is crucial to resolving a property dispute, under what condition can that statement be considered admissible under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Only if the missing person is declared legally dead
• B) B) Only if the missing person is found alive
• C) C) Only if the missing person left a written will
• D) D) Only if the missing person was of sound mind

Q15: 15. If a person who is now missing made a statement to their best friend regarding a business deal, can that statement be considered relevant under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Yes, because the friend has a vested interest in the matter
• B) B) No, because it was a casual conversation
• C) C) Yes, if the friend is willing to testify in court
• D) D) No, because business deals are not covered under Section 32

Q16: 16. When can a statement made by a deceased person to their lawyer be admissible under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Only if the lawyer is a registered legal practitioner
• B) B) Only if the statement was made in the presence of witnesses
• C) C) Only if the lawyer had power of attorney
• D) D) Only if the statement relates to a legal matter in issue

Q17: 17. If a person who is now deceased made a statement to their therapist about witnessing a crime, can that statement be considered relevant under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Yes, if the therapist is a court-appointed expert
• B) B) No, because therapy sessions are confidential
• C) C) Yes, if the therapist breaches patient confidentiality
• D) D) No, because it was not made in anticipation of death

Q18: 18. In a situation where a person who is now deceased made a statement to a social worker about domestic abuse, can that statement be admitted as evidence under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Yes, if the social worker is a mandated reporter
• B) B) No, because social workers are not legal professionals
• C) C) Yes, if the statement was made in a public setting
• D) D) No, because domestic abuse cases are not covered under Section 32

Q19: 19. What type of statement made by a person who is now deceased can be admissible under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, even if it is not made in anticipation of death?

• A) A) A statement made during a religious ceremony
• B) B) A statement made during a political rally
• C) C) A statement made in a private letter
• D) D) A statement made in a public speech

Q20: 20. If a person who is now deceased made a statement to their financial advisor about their will, can that statement be considered relevant under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Yes, if the financial advisor is a licensed estate planner
• B) B) No, because wills must be notarized to be admissible
• C) C) Yes, if the statement was made in the presence of witnesses
• D) D) No, because wills are governed by separate laws

Q21: 21. In a real-life scenario involving a missing person, if a statement made by that person is crucial to resolving a custody dispute, under what condition can that statement be considered admissible under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Only if the missing person is declared legally incompetent
• B) B) Only if the missing person is found alive
• C) C) Only if the missing person left a written statement
• D) D) Only if the missing person was a legal guardian

Q22: 22. If a person who is now missing made a statement to their neighbor about a property boundary issue, can that statement be considered relevant under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Yes, if the neighbor is a land surveyor
• B) B) No, because property disputes must be settled in court
• C) C) Yes, if the statement was made in writing
• D) D) No, because property boundaries are not covered under Section 32

Q23: 23. When can a statement made by a deceased person to their business partner be admissible under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Only if the business partner is a legal expert
• B) B) Only if the business partner has a financial interest in the matter
• C) C) Only if the statement was made in the presence of witnesses
• D) D) Only if the statement relates to a business transaction in issue

Q24: 24. If a person who is now deceased made a statement to their spiritual advisor about a personal conflict, can that statement be considered relevant under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Yes, because spiritual advisors are considered neutral parties
• B) B) No, because personal conflicts are not legal matters
• C) C) Yes, if the advisor is willing to testify in court
• D) D) No, because confidential communications are protected

Q25: 25. In a case where a person is declared legally dead due to being missing for over 7 years, what type of statement made by that person can be admissible under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Only statements related to financial matters
• B) B) Only statements made in a public forum
• C) C) Only statements made to family members
• D) D) Any relevant statement made by the person