KG2PG

Q1: 1. In which section of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 is the provision for order to pay costs in non-cognizable cases mentioned?

Q2: 2. What action can be taken in non-cognizable cases under Section 359 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973?

Q3: 3. Under Section 359, what is the purpose of ordering the accused to pay costs in non-cognizable cases?

Q4: 4. When can the court order the accused to pay costs in a non-cognizable case according to Section 359?

Q5: 5. What is the consequence of failing to pay the costs as ordered under Section 359 in a non-cognizable case?

Q6: 6. In a scenario where a non-cognizable case is filed and the court finds it to be frivolous, what action can the court take under Section 359?

Q7: 7. How does the provision of ordering costs in non-cognizable cases under Section 359 help in maintaining the efficiency of the legal system?

Q8: 8. What factors does the court consider while determining the amount of costs to be paid by the accused under Section 359?

Q9: 9. In a non-cognizable case where the accused is ordered to pay costs, who is responsible for collecting the amount as per Section 359?

Q10: 10. What is the primary objective of imposing costs in non-cognizable cases under Section 359?

Q11: 11. How does the provision of ordering costs in non-cognizable cases contribute to access to justice for all parties involved?

Q12: 12. In a case where the accused is unable to pay the costs as ordered under Section 359, what alternative measures can the court take?

Q13: 13. How can the provision of ordering costs in non-cognizable cases enhance the credibility of the legal system?

Q14: 14. What is the significance of Section 359 in deterring individuals from filing baseless complaints in non-cognizable cases?

Q15: 15. How does the provision of ordering costs in non-cognizable cases align with the principles of natural justice?

Q16: 16. What role does the complainant play in the court's decision to order costs in non-cognizable cases under Section 359?

Q17: 17. How does the provision of ordering costs in non-cognizable cases promote a sense of accountability among the parties involved?

Q18: 18. What safeguards are in place to prevent the misuse of the provision for ordering costs in non-cognizable cases under Section 359?

Q19: 19. How does the provision of ordering costs in non-cognizable cases under Section 359 contribute to the overall effectiveness of the criminal justice system?

Q20: 20. What measures can the court take if the accused refuses to comply with the order to pay costs in a non-cognizable case under Section 359?

Q21: 21. How does the provision of ordering costs in non-cognizable cases align with the principles of fairness and equity in legal proceedings?

Q22: 22. What impact does the order to pay costs in non-cognizable cases have on the accused's future legal standing?

Q23: 23. In a situation where the accused is unable to pay the costs as ordered under Section 359, what recourse does the court have to enforce the payment?

Q24: 24. How does the provision for ordering costs in non-cognizable cases under Section 359 reflect the balance between protecting the rights of the accused and deterring abuse of legal process?

Q25: 25. What ethical considerations should the court take into account when ordering costs in non-cognizable cases under Section 359?

Q26: 1. In which section of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 is the provision for an order to pay costs in non-cognizable cases mentioned?

Q27: 2. What is the purpose of an order to pay costs in non-cognizable cases under Section 359 of the CrPC 1973?

Q28: 3. Who has the authority to pass an order to pay costs in non-cognizable cases as per Section 359 of the CrPC 1973?

Q29: 4. Under Section 359 of the CrPC 1973, what factors may a Magistrate consider before passing an order to pay costs in non-cognizable cases?

Q30: 5. In a real-life scenario, if a complainant files a false non-cognizable case against a person out of personal enmity, what action can the Magistrate take under Section 359?

Q31: 6. What happens if a person fails to pay the costs imposed by the Magistrate under Section 359 of the CrPC 1973?

Q32: 7. How does the provision of order to pay costs in non-cognizable cases help in reducing the burden on the judiciary?

Q33: 8. Under Section 359 of the CrPC 1973, what is the maximum amount of costs that can be imposed on the accused in a non-cognizable case?

Q34: 9. When can a complainant be directed to pay costs to the accused under Section 359 of the CrPC 1973?

Q35: 10. In a situation where a complainant withdraws a non-cognizable case after filing it, can the Magistrate still order the complainant to pay costs under Section 359?

Q36: 11. How does the provision of order to pay costs in non-cognizable cases promote justice in the legal system?

Q37: 12. Under Section 359 of the CrPC 1973, what is the primary objective of imposing costs in non-cognizable cases?

Q38: 13. If a complainant files multiple false non-cognizable cases against the same accused, what action can the Magistrate take under Section 359?

Q39: 14. In a case where the accused is acquitted due to lack of evidence, can the Magistrate still order the complainant to pay costs under Section 359?

Q40: 15. How does the provision of order to pay costs in non-cognizable cases contribute to the principle of access to justice?

Q41: 16. If the accused is unable to pay the costs imposed by the Magistrate under Section 359, what alternative action can be taken?

Q42: 17. What role does the provision of order to pay costs in non-cognizable cases play in maintaining the integrity of the legal system?

Q43: 18. In a case where the complainant refuses to cooperate with the court proceedings, can the Magistrate still order the complainant to pay costs under Section 359?

Q44: 19. If a complainant withdraws a non-cognizable case after the accused has suffered reputational harm, can the Magistrate still order the complainant to pay costs under Section 359?

Q45: 20. How does the provision of order to pay costs in non-cognizable cases strike a balance between protecting the rights of the accused and preventing misuse of legal machinery?

Q46: 21. Can the costs imposed under Section 359 of the CrPC 1973 be waived off by the Magistrate at their discretion?

Q47: 22. What impact does the provision of order to pay costs in non-cognizable cases have on the administration of justice?

Q48: 23. In a case where the accused is found guilty but unable to pay the costs imposed by the Magistrate, what options does the accused have?

Q49: 24. How does the provision of order to pay costs in non-cognizable cases align with the principles of natural justice and fairness?

Q50: 25. In a scenario where the costs imposed by the Magistrate are not paid by either party, what implications does it have on the case?

Score Summary