Q1: 1. In the context of Section 369 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, who is required to sign the confirmation or new sentence?

• A) A) One Judge
• B) B) Three Judges
• C) C) Two Judges
• D) D) Four Judges

Q2: 2. Why is it important for two Judges to sign the confirmation or new sentence according to Section 369?

• A) A) To speed up the judicial process
• B) B) To ensure accountability and oversight
• C) C) To reduce paperwork
• D) D) To show superiority over lower courts

Q3: 3. Which of the following statements is true regarding Section 369 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973?

• A) A) It only applies to civil cases
• B) B) It ensures swift execution of death sentences
• C) C) It requires a unanimous decision of the two Judges
• D) D) It promotes transparency in the judicial system

Q4: 4. What happens if the two Judges do not agree on the confirmation or new sentence under Section 369?

• A) A) The decision is referred to a single Judge
• B) B) The case is dismissed
• C) C) A third Judge is brought in for consultation
• D) D) The decision is referred to a larger bench

Q5: 5. Which of the following scenarios would require the confirmation or new sentence to be signed by two Judges under Section 369?

• A) A) Traffic violation
• B) B) Petty theft
• C) C) Capital punishment
• D) D) Civil dispute

Q6: 6. How does the requirement of two Judges signing the confirmation or new sentence impact the legal system?

• A) A) Increases the workload of Judges
• B) B) Ensures a fair and thorough review process
• C) C) Delays justice for the accused
• D) D) Decreases public trust in the judiciary

Q7: 7. Which of the following is a potential challenge faced in implementing Section 369 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973?

• A) A) Lack of qualified Judges
• B) B) Political interference
• C) C) Public protests
• D) D) Media bias

Q8: 8. What is the significance of requiring two Judges to sign the confirmation or new sentence in death penalty cases?

• A) A) Prevents false convictions
• B) B) Speeds up the appeal process
• C) C) Reduces the burden on the judiciary
• D) D) Ensures a higher level of scrutiny

Q9: 9. How does the provision of Section 369 contribute to the protection of human rights?

• A) A) Prevents access to legal representation
• B) B) Ensures fair trial and review process
• C) C) Increases the use of torture
• D) D) Promotes discrimination

Q10: 10. Which of the following statements accurately describes the purpose of Section 369 in the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973?

• A) A) To expedite all legal proceedings
• B) B) To provide a safeguard against wrongful convictions
• C) C) To bypass the appellate process
• D) D) To limit the judicial oversight

Q11: 11. How does the requirement of two Judges signing the confirmation or new sentence impact the finality of death penalty cases?

• A) A) Increases the likelihood of errors
• B) B) Ensures thorough deliberation and review
• C) C) Speeds up the execution process
• D) D) Creates confusion in the legal system

Q12: 12. Which of the following best describes the role of two Judges in the confirmation or new sentence process under Section 369?

• A) A) To intimidate the accused
• B) B) To ensure political influence
• C) C) To provide independent scrutiny
• D) D) To expedite the trial

Q13: 13. What potential impact does the requirement of two Judges signing the confirmation or new sentence have on the efficiency of the judicial system?

• A) A) Slows down the legal process
• B) B) Increases the backlog of cases
• C) C) Ensures greater accuracy and fairness
• D) D) Promotes corruption

Q14: 14. In what circumstances would a case be subject to the confirmation or new sentence requirement under Section 369?

• A) A) Civil disputes
• B) B) Minor offenses
• C) C) Serious criminal offenses like murder
• D) D) Traffic violations

Q15: 15. How does the provision of Section 369 contribute to maintaining public trust in the judiciary?

• A) A) By allowing private hearings
• B) B) By promoting transparency and accountability
• C) C) By excluding legal representation
• D) D) By limiting access to case information

Q16: 16. Which of the following is a potential consequence of bypassing the requirement of two Judges signing the confirmation or new sentence under Section 369?

• A) A) Increased public confidence in the legal system
• B) B) Higher risk of wrongful convictions
• C) C) Faster resolution of cases
• D) D) Reduction in judicial errors

Q17: 17. What measures can be taken to ensure the effective implementation of Section 369 in death penalty cases?

• A) A) Increasing political interference
• B) B) Providing adequate training to Judges
• C) C) Limiting access to legal aid
• D) D) Ignoring public opinion

Q18: 18. How does the requirement of two Judges signing the confirmation or new sentence align with principles of natural justice?

• A) A) By excluding the right to appeal
• B) B) By ensuring a fair and unbiased review process
• C) C) By allowing arbitrary decision-making
• D) D) By limiting access to legal representation

Q19: 19. Which of the following statements best reflects the intent behind Section 369 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973?

• A) A) To expedite the execution of death sentences
• B) B) To safeguard against errors and miscarriage of justice
• C) C) To limit the role of the judiciary in criminal cases
• D) D) To discourage appeals from the accused

Q20: 20. How does the requirement of two Judges signing the confirmation or new sentence impact the consistency of legal decisions?

• A) A) Leads to arbitrary judgments
• B) B) Ensures uniformity and fairness
• C) C) Delays the resolution of cases
• D) D) Increases the burden on lower courts

Q21: 21. What challenges might arise if the provision of Section 369 is not followed in death penalty cases?

• A) A) Violation of human rights
• B) B) Delay in justice
• C) C) Increased public trust
• D) D) Decrease in crime rates

Q22: 22. How does the requirement of two Judges signing the confirmation or new sentence uphold the dignity of the accused in death penalty cases?

• A) A) By expediting the trial process
• B) B) By ensuring a thorough review of evidence
• C) C) By limiting access to legal representation
• D) D) By ignoring case details

Q23: 23. Which of the following is a potential benefit of the provision of Section 369 in the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973?

• A) A) Decrease in transparency
• B) B) Increase in judicial errors
• C) C) Safeguard against wrongful convictions
• D) D) Limitation of legal appeals

Q24: 24. How does the provision of Section 369 contribute to the accountability of the judiciary in death penalty cases?

• A) A) By promoting secrecy in decision-making
• B) B) By ensuring oversight and scrutiny
• C) C) By excluding public knowledge
• D) D) By bypassing legal procedures

Q25: 25. What role does the requirement of two Judges signing the confirmation or new sentence play in protecting the rights of the accused?

• A) A) Increases the chances of unfair trials
• B) B) Ensures a fair and transparent legal process
• C) C) Reduces access to legal representation
• D) D) Promotes discrimination