Q1: 1. What is the relevance of judgments, orders, or decrees under Section 42 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) They are admissible in all court proceedings
• B) B) They are not admissible as evidence
• C) C) They are admissible to prove the existence of facts in issue or relevant facts
• D) D) They are admissible only in criminal cases

Q2: 2. In a civil case, how can a judgment from a previous case be used under Section 42 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) To establish the guilt of the accused
• B) B) To prove that a particular fact is in issue or relevant
• C) C) To determine the sentence for the accused
• D) D) To dismiss the current case

Q3: 3. Which of the following is NOT covered under Section 42 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Judgments from foreign courts
• B) B) Decrees in suits for land
• C) C) Orders in interlocutory proceedings
• D) D) Judgments in criminal cases

Q4: 4. A real-life scenario where a judgment from another case can be relevant under Section 42 is

• A) A) A landlord using a previous eviction order to prove non-payment of rent by a tenant
• B) B) A student presenting a school report card as evidence in a court case
• C) C) A chef referencing a recipe book in a contract dispute
• D) D) A doctor submitting medical research articles in a property dispute

Q5: 5. Which type of court orders are admissible under Section 42 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Orders related to traffic violations
• B) B) Orders determining the admissibility of evidence in a trial
• C) C) Orders from administrative bodies
• D) D) Orders issued by private organizations

Q6: 6. In a property dispute, how can a previous decree be relevant under Section 42 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) To establish ownership of the property in question
• B) B) To prove the weather conditions on a specific date
• C) C) To determine the cost of repairs needed on the property
• D) D) To showcase the property's aesthetic value

Q7: 7. Which of the following best describes the effect of judgments, orders, or decrees under Section 42 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) They are binding on all courts in India
• B) B) They are only relevant if issued by the Supreme Court
• C) C) They are only relevant if they are recent
• D) D) They are relevant if they relate to facts in issue or relevant facts

Q8: 8. A situation where a judgment from another case may not be admissible under Section 42 is

• A) A) Using a divorce decree to prove marital status in an inheritance case
• B) B) Referring to a criminal judgment to prove innocence in a civil case
• C) C) Citing a judgment on contract law to resolve a property dispute
• D) D) Presenting a judgment from a lower court in a higher court

Q9: 9. How can a judgment in a case of defamation be relevant under Section 42 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) To establish the reputation of the accused
• B) B) To prove the truthfulness of the defamatory statement
• C) C) To determine the damages awarded in a defamation case
• D) D) To show the impact of the defamatory statement on the plaintiff

Q10: 10. Which of the following is a crucial factor in determining the admissibility of a judgment under Section 42?

• A) A) The popularity of the case in media
• B) B) The authenticity of the judgment
• C) C) The length of the judgment
• D) D) The language in which the judgment is written

Q11: 11. In a contract dispute, how can a previous order relating to breach of contract be relevant under Section 42?

• A) A) To establish the intention of the parties while entering into the contract
• B) B) To determine the location of the contract signing
• C) C) To prove the value of the contract
• D) D) To ascertain the font size used in the contract

Q12: 12. Which of the following is NOT a requirement for a judgment to be admissible under Section 42?

• A) A) The judgment must be final
• B) B) The judgment must be relevant to the case at hand
• C) C) The judgment must be recent
• D) D) The judgment must be authentic

Q13: 13. How can a previous judgment in a case of medical malpractice be relevant under Section 42?

• A) A) To establish the doctor's reputation
• B) B) To determine the patient's medical history
• C) C) To prove the standard of care in the medical profession
• D) D) To assess the doctor's handwriting

Q14: 14. Which of the following is a limitation on the admissibility of judgments under Section 42?

• A) A) The judgment must be from the same court
• B) B) The judgment must be from a court of higher jurisdiction
• C) C) The judgment must be from a different state
• D) D) The judgment must be from a foreign court

Q15: 15. In a case involving intellectual property rights, how can a previous judgment on patent infringement be relevant under Section 42?

• A) A) To prove the validity of the patent
• B) B) To establish the creativity of the inventor
• C) C) To determine the color of the patented product
• D) D) To assess the marketing strategy of the patent holder

Q16: 16. Which of the following statements is true regarding the relevancy of judgments under Section 42?

• A) A) Judgments are always admissible as conclusive evidence
• B) B) Judgments are admissible to prove the truth of the facts decided
• C) C) Judgments are admissible only if they are unanimous
• D) D) Judgments are admissible in criminal cases only

Q17: 17. How can a judgment in a case of breach of trust be relevant under Section 42?

• A) A) To determine the color of the breached object
• B) B) To prove the trustworthiness of the accused
• C) C) To establish the terms of the trust
• D) D) To assess the emotional impact of the breach

Q18: 18. Which of the following is NOT a condition for the admissibility of judgments under Section 42?

• A) A) The judgment must be relevant to the facts in issue
• B) B) The judgment must be from a recognized court
• C) C) The judgment must be final and conclusive
• D) D) The judgment must be recent

Q19: 19. In a case involving a breach of contract, how can a previous judgment on similar breach be relevant under Section 42?

• A) A) To prove the weather conditions at the time of breach
• B) B) To establish the damages caused by the breach
• C) C) To determine the favorite color of the parties involved
• D) D) To showcase the negotiation skills of the parties

Q20: 20. Which of the following is NOT a purpose of admitting judgments under Section 42?

• A) A) To prevent delays in court proceedings
• B) B) To ensure consistency in legal decisions
• C) C) To establish the truth of the facts decided
• D) D) To assist in reaching a just conclusion

Q21: 21. How can a judgment in a case of property damage be relevant under Section 42?

• A) A) To determine the favorite food of the property owner
• B) B) To prove the extent of the damage
• C) C) To establish the property's age
• D) D) To assess the property's architectural design

Q22: 22. Which of the following factors may affect the weight given to a judgment under Section 42?

• A) A) The popularity of the judge
• B) B) The length of the judgment
• C) C) The font size used in the judgment
• D) D) The reasoning and analysis provided in the judgment

Q23: 23. In a case involving a motor vehicle accident, how can a previous judgment on negligence be relevant under Section 42?

• A) A) To establish the speed of the vehicles involved
• B) B) To prove the weather conditions at the time of the accident
• C) C) To determine the liability of the parties
• D) D) To assess the color of the vehicles

Q24: 24. Which of the following is a key consideration for the admissibility of judgments under Section 42?

• A) A) The popularity of the case
• B) B) The location of the court that issued the judgment
• C) C) The relevance of the judgment to the facts in issue
• D) D) The number of pages in the judgment

Q25: 25. How can a judgment in a case of employment dispute be relevant under Section 42?

• A) A) To establish the employment history of the parties
• B) B) To prove the favorite movie of the employer
• C) C) To determine the color of the office furniture
• D) D) To assess the holiday schedule of the employees