KG2PG

Q1: 1. In which situation can opinion as to handwriting be relevant under Section 47 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

Q2: 2. What is the primary purpose of introducing Section 47 in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

Q3: 3. When can an expert provide an opinion on handwriting under Section 47?

Q4: 4. Which of the following statements is true regarding the admissibility of opinion as to handwriting under Section 47?

Q5: 5. In a case involving a disputed will, which provision of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 would be relevant for obtaining opinion as to handwriting?

Q6: 6. A real-life problem: In a forgery case, the prosecution wants to establish the authenticity of the signature on a document. Which section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 would be applicable?

Q7: 7. When can a layperson provide an opinion on handwriting under Section 47?

Q8: 8. Which of the following scenarios would not qualify for obtaining opinion as to handwriting under Section 47?

Q9: 9. A real-life problem: In a property dispute case, the court needs to verify the authenticity of the seller's signature on the sale deed. Which provision of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 would be relevant?

Q10: 10. Who is considered an expert for providing opinion as to handwriting under Section 47?

Q11: 11. In a case of suspected fraud involving a forged signature, which provision allows for obtaining opinion as to handwriting?

Q12: 12. Can an opinion as to handwriting be conclusive evidence under Section 47 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

Q13: 13. A real-life problem: A business owner suspects that a contract was signed by someone else fraudulently. Which section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 would be relevant for proving the forgery?

Q14: 14. What is the significance of opinion as to handwriting under Section 47 in the context of legal proceedings?

Q15: 15. When seeking an opinion as to handwriting, what factors are typically considered by the expert under Section 47?

Q16: 16. In a case involving a disputed contract, which provision would allow for obtaining opinion as to the authenticity of signatures?

Q17: 17. Can a person provide an opinion as to handwriting based solely on their memory without examining the document under Section 47?

Q18: 18. A real-life problem: In a case of suspected identity theft where a forged signature was used, which provision of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 would be applicable for proving the forgery?

Q19: 19. What precautions should be taken when relying on opinion as to handwriting under Section 47 in legal proceedings?

Q20: 20. In a case involving a disputed contract, who has the burden of proof when presenting opinion as to handwriting under Section 47?

Q21: 21. Can a layperson's opinion as to handwriting hold the same weight as that of a handwriting expert under Section 47?

Q22: 22. A real-life problem: In a case of suspected will forgery, the court needs to verify the authenticity of the deceased's signature. Which provision of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 would be relevant for proving the forgery?

Q23: 23. What steps should be taken if there are conflicting opinions as to handwriting under Section 47 in a legal proceeding?

Q24: 24. In a case involving a disputed property deed, which provision allows for obtaining opinion as to the authenticity of signatures?

Q25: 25. Can opinion as to handwriting under Section 47 be used to prove the contents of a document?

Score Summary