Q1: 1. What is the purpose of Section 75 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973?

• A) A) To notify the accused about the warrant against them
• B) B) To notify the police about the warrant against the accused
• C) C) To notify the court about the warrant against the accused
• D) D) To notify the media about the warrant against the accused

Q2: 2. Who is responsible for notifying the substance of the warrant under Section 75 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973?

• A) A) The accused
• B) B) The police officer serving the warrant
• C) C) The court issuing the warrant
• D) D) The victim of the crime

Q3: 3. In a real-life scenario, if a warrant is issued against a person, who should ensure that the substance of the warrant is notified to the accused?

• A) A) The accused themselves
• B) B) The police officer serving the warrant
• C) C) The defense attorney
• D) D) The judge

Q4: 4. What happens if the substance of the warrant is not properly notified to the accused as per Section 75 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973?

• A) A) The warrant is deemed invalid
• B) B) The accused can escape legal consequences
• C) C) The police can arrest anyone in place of the accused
• D) D) The court dismisses the case

Q5: 5. Which of the following is NOT a requirement under Section 75 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 regarding the notification of the substance of the warrant?

• A) A) Time frame for notification
• B) B) Method of notification
• C) C) Language of notification
• D) D) Duration of notification

Q6: 6. In a hypothetical situation, if the police fail to notify the accused about the substance of the warrant within the specified time frame, what could be the legal implications?

• A) A) The warrant becomes non-enforceable
• B) B) The accused can file a lawsuit against the police
• C) C) The police can extend the notification period
• D) D) The court issues a new warrant

Q7: 7. Who can challenge the validity of the warrant based on improper notification of its substance under Section 75 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973?

• A) A) The accused only
• B) B) The police only
• C) C) The court only
• D) D) Both the accused and the police

Q8: 8. What is the significance of notifying the substance of the warrant to the accused in a criminal proceeding?

• A) A) To inform the accused of the charges against them
• B) B) To warn the accused about potential arrest
• C) C) To give the accused time to escape
• D) D) To intimidate the accused

Q9: 9. How does the notification of the substance of the warrant protect the rights of the accused under Section 75 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973?

• A) A) By ensuring transparency in legal proceedings
• B) B) By preventing the accused from hiring an attorney
• C) C) By facilitating quicker arrests
• D) D) By limiting the options for the accused

Q10: 10. In a real-life case, if the police mistakenly notify the wrong person about the substance of the warrant, what should the correct procedure be?

• A) A) Correct the mistake and notify the actual accused
• B) B) Proceed with the arrest of the wrong person
• C) C) Ignore the mistake and continue the investigation
• D) D) Inform the media about the mistake

Q11: 11. Under Section 75 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, what role does the court play in the notification of the substance of the warrant?

• A) A) Issuing the warrant only
• B) B) Ensuring proper notification by the police
• C) C) Informing the media about the warrant
• D) D) Providing legal advice to the accused

Q12: 12. If the substance of the warrant is not notified to the accused in a language they understand, what legal issue may arise?

• A) A) Violation of the accused's right to a fair trial
• B) B) Delay in the arrest process
• C) C) Exemption of the accused from appearing in court
• D) D) Disqualification of the warrant

Q13: 13. How does the notification of the substance of the warrant contribute to the efficiency of the criminal justice system?

• A) A) By preventing arrests altogether
• B) B) By enabling the accused to prepare a defense
• C) C) By delaying court proceedings
• D) D) By complicating legal matters

Q14: 14. In a practical scenario, what steps should the police take to ensure proper notification of the substance of the warrant to the accused?

• A) A) Send an email notification
• B) B) Physically serve the warrant and explain its contents
• C) C) Notify the accused through social media
• D) D) Contact the accused's family instead

Q15: 15. What happens if the police fail to notify the accused about the substance of the warrant before making an arrest?

• A) A) The arrest is considered illegal
• B) B) The court dismisses the charges against the accused
• C) C) The accused is released immediately
• D) D) The police are exempt from informing the accused

Q16: 16. Which of the following best describes the purpose of Section 75 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973?

• A) A) To confuse the accused
• B) B) To ensure the accused is aware of the charges
• C) C) To speed up the arrest process
• D) D) To protect the identity of the accused

Q17: 17. If the police notify the accused about the warrant but do not disclose the specific charges, does it comply with Section 75 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973?

• A) A) Yes
• B) B) No
• C) C) Only if the accused requests the information
• D) D) Depends on the severity of the charges

Q18: 18. In a real-life scenario, if the accused refuses to accept the notification of the substance of the warrant, what should the police do?

• A) A) Proceed with the arrest
• B) B) Leave the warrant at the accused's doorstep
• C) C) Seek a court order for notification
• D) D) Drop the charges against the accused

Q19: 19. How does the notification of the substance of the warrant align with the principles of natural justice and fair trial in criminal proceedings?

• A) A) By allowing the accused to evade arrest
• B) B) By preventing the accused from knowing the charges
• C) C) By providing an opportunity for the accused to defend themselves
• D) D) By limiting the accused's access to legal representation

Q20: 20. What measures can be taken if the accused claims they did not receive proper notification of the warrant under Section 75 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973?

• A) A) File a complaint against the police
• B) B) Ignore the claim and proceed with the trial
• C) C) Reissue the warrant with corrected information
• D) D) Release the accused without charges

Q21: 21. How does the notification of the substance of the warrant contribute to the accountability of law enforcement agencies?

• A) A) By allowing them to act without transparency
• B) B) By ensuring proper documentation of notifications
• C) C) By exempting them from notifying the accused
• D) D) By speeding up the arrest process

Q22: 22. In a practical scenario, who can witness the notification of the substance of the warrant to ensure its validity?

• A) A) The accused's family members
• B) B) A legal representative of the accused
• C) C) A neutral third party
• D) D) The arresting police officer

Q23: 23. If the police notify the accused about the warrant but provide incorrect information regarding the charges, what legal consequences may follow?

• A) A) The accused is automatically acquitted
• B) B) The police face disciplinary action
• C) C) The court corrects the mistake
• D) D) The warrant is deemed invalid

Q24: 24. What role does the accused play in the notification process of the warrant under Section 75 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973?

• A) A) None, it is solely the responsibility of the police
• B) B) They must actively seek notification
• C) C) They must acknowledge receipt of the notification
• D) D) They can refuse to accept the notification

Q25: 25. How does the notification of the substance of the warrant enhance the transparency of legal proceedings in criminal cases?

• A) A) By keeping the charges confidential
• B) B) By allowing secret trials
• C) C) By informing the accused of the allegations against them
• D) D) By limiting public access to court information