Q1: 1. What does Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 deal with?

• A) A) Exclusion of oral evidence
• B) B) Exclusion of documentary evidence
• C) C) Admissibility of expert testimony
• D) D) None of the above

Q2: 2. In which situation does Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 apply?

• A) A) When there is a written contract
• B) B) When there is an oral agreement contradicting the terms of a written contract
• C) C) When both parties agree to provide oral evidence
• D) D) None of the above

Q3: 3. What type of evidence is excluded under Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Oral evidence
• B) B) Documentary evidence
• C) C) Expert testimony
• D) D) Circumstantial evidence

Q4: 4. In a real-life scenario, if a written agreement states a different price than what was orally agreed upon, which evidence would be excluded under Section 92?

• A) A) Oral evidence of the agreed price
• B) B) Written evidence of the agreed price
• C) C) Expert testimony on pricing
• D) D) Hearsay evidence

Q5: 5. When can oral evidence be admitted despite the provisions of Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) When the written agreement is missing
• B) B) When the oral agreement is witnessed by a notary
• C) C) When the written agreement is incomplete
• D) D) None of the above

Q6: 6. Which of the following is NOT a requirement for the application of Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Existence of a written agreement
• B) B) Existence of an oral agreement
• C) C) Contradiction between the written and oral agreements
• D) D) Intent to defraud

Q7: 7. In a case where a property sale deed mentions a different payment schedule than what was orally agreed upon, what evidence would be excluded under Section 92?

• A) A) Oral evidence of the payment schedule
• B) B) Written evidence of the payment schedule
• C) C) Proof of bank transfer
• D) D) Witness testimony

Q8: 8. Which section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 allows for the exclusion of oral evidence in certain situations?

• A) A) Section 91
• B) B) Section 92
• C) C) Section 93
• D) D) Section 94

Q9: 9. What is the rationale behind the exclusion of oral evidence under Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) To prevent fraud and perjury
• B) B) To encourage oral agreements
• C) C) To simplify legal proceedings
• D) D) None of the above

Q10: 10. In a dispute over the terms of a partnership agreement, which type of evidence would be excluded under Section 92?

• A) A) Oral evidence of profit-sharing ratio
• B) B) Written evidence of business expenses
• C) C) Expert opinion on market trends
• D) D) Social media posts related to the business

Q11: 11. When can oral evidence be used to explain the terms of a written agreement under Section 92?

• A) A) When the written agreement is ambiguous
• B) B) When the oral evidence is supported by video recording
• C) C) When the written agreement is in a foreign language
• D) D) None of the above

Q12: 12. Which of the following is NOT a condition for the application of Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) Written agreement must be registered
• B) B) Oral agreement must be prior or contemporaneous to the written agreement
• C) C) Oral agreement must contradict the terms of the written agreement
• D) D) None of the above

Q13: 13. In a case involving a lease agreement where the rent amount stated in writing differs from the orally agreed rent amount, which evidence would be excluded under Section 92?

• A) A) Oral evidence of the rent amount
• B) B) Bank statements showing rent payments
• C) C) Text messages discussing rent terms
• D) D) Landlord's testimony

Q14: 14. What is the primary purpose of Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

• A) A) To promote oral agreements over written contracts
• B) B) To prioritize documentary evidence in legal disputes
• C) C) To prevent parties from using oral evidence to vary the terms of a written agreement
• D) D) None of the above

Q15: 15. In a scenario where a will specifies different beneficiaries than what was orally promised by the deceased, which evidence would be excluded under Section 92?

• A) A) Oral promises made to beneficiaries
• B) B) Witness testimony on the deceased's intentions
• C) C) Bank statements showing inheritance transfers
• D) D) Social media posts mentioning the will

Q16: 16. Which of the following is NOT a consequence of the exclusion of oral evidence under Section 92?

• A) A) Upholding the sanctity of written agreements
• B) B) Avoiding disputes arising from contradictory oral statements
• C) C) Limiting the court's ability to consider all relevant information
• D) D) Ensuring fair treatment of all parties involved

Q17: 17. When can oral evidence be admitted to show fraud or mistake under Section 92?

• A) A) To prove the existence of a secret agreement
• B) B) To demonstrate the parties' genuine intentions
• C) C) To contradict a written agreement
• D) D) None of the above

Q18: 18. In a case where a sales contract mentions a different delivery date than what was orally agreed upon, which evidence would be excluded under Section 92?

• A) A) Oral evidence of the delivery date
• B) B) Delivery receipt signed by the buyer
• C) C) Email correspondence discussing delivery logistics
• D) D) Courier tracking information

Q19: 19. Which principle underlies the exclusion of oral evidence in cases covered by Section 92?

• A) A) Principle of equity
• B) B) Principle of estoppel
• C) C) Parol evidence rule
• D) D) Doctrine of frustration

Q20: 20. In a dispute over the terms of a construction contract, which type of evidence would be excluded under Section 92?

• A) A) Oral testimony of the project deadlines
• B) B) Architect's drawings and blueprints
• C) C) Invoices for construction materials
• D) D) Newspaper articles about the construction industry

Q21: 21. How does the exclusion of oral evidence under Section 92 contribute to legal certainty?

• A) A) By allowing parties to freely change terms of a written agreement
• B) B) By preventing parties from altering the written agreement through oral claims
• C) C) By encouraging verbal negotiations over written contracts
• D) D) None of the above

Q22: 22. In a situation where a rental lease agreement specifies a different lease term than what was orally agreed upon, which evidence would be excluded under Section 92?

• A) A) Oral evidence of the lease term
• B) B) Lease agreement signed by both parties
• C) C) Social media posts about the rental property
• D) D) Tenant's personal diary entries

Q23: 23. What is the general rule regarding the admissibility of oral evidence under Section 92 when a written agreement exists?

• A) A) Oral evidence is always admissible
• B) B) Oral evidence is never admissible
• C) C) Oral evidence is admissible to explain but not contradict the written agreement
• D) D) Oral evidence is admissible only if supported by video recordings

Q24: 24. In a case where a loan agreement states a different repayment schedule than what was orally agreed upon, which evidence would be excluded under Section 92?

• A) A) Oral evidence of the repayment schedule
• B) B) Bank statements showing loan repayments
• C) C) Text messages discussing loan terms
• D) D) Financial advisor's opinion on loan terms

Q25: 25. How does the exclusion of oral evidence under Section 92 promote legal consistency and predictability in contractual matters?

• A) A) By allowing parties to introduce new terms through oral agreements
• B) B) By ensuring that written agreements are upheld without contradiction
• C) C) By encouraging verbal negotiations to take precedence over written contracts
• D) D) None of the above