KG2PG

Q1: 1. In Section 94 of the Indian Penal Code 1860, what does "compelled by threats" refer to?

Q2: 2. When a person is compelled to commit an act by threats of immediate death, what defense can be invoked under Section 94?

Q3: 3. Under Section 94, what kind of threats can constitute coercion?

Q4: 4. In a real-life scenario, if a person is forced to steal from a store under threat of violence, which defense can be applied under Section 94?

Q5: 5. When a person is compelled to commit an act by threats, what must be the nature of the threats?

Q6: 6. Under Section 94, what is the key element that distinguishes coercion from other defenses?

Q7: 7. If a person is coerced into committing a crime under Section 94, what is the legal consequence for that person?

Q8: 8. In a situation where a person is threatened with harm to their family unless they commit a crime, which defense can be raised under Section 94?

Q9: 9. What is the primary purpose of Section 94 in the Indian Penal Code 1860?

Q10: 10. If a person is coerced into signing a fraudulent document under threat of physical harm, what defense can be invoked under Section 94?

Q11: 11. Under Section 94, what is the responsibility of the court when coercion is claimed as a defense?

Q12: 12. If a person is coerced into giving false testimony in court under threat of harm, which defense can be applied under Section 94?

Q13: 13. In a case where a person is forced to participate in illegal activities under threat of violence, which defense is relevant under Section 94?

Q14: 14. When assessing a claim of coercion under Section 94, what factors should the court consider?

Q15: 15. If a person is coerced into committing a crime that results in harm to others, what legal principle can be invoked under Section 94?

Q16: 16. In a case where a person is threatened with public humiliation unless they engage in criminal activities, which defense can be asserted under Section 94?

Q17: 17. What distinguishes coercion under Section 94 from other defenses such as necessity or self-defense?

Q18: 18. If a person is coerced into committing an act under threat of financial ruin, which defense applies under Section 94?

Q19: 19. When evaluating a claim of coercion under Section 94, what burden of proof lies with the accused?

Q20: 20. In a scenario where a person is threatened with physical harm unless they commit a crime, what defense can be raised under Section 94?

Q21: 21. If a person is coerced into providing false alibis for a crime under threat of harm, which defense can be invoked under Section 94?

Q22: 22. When assessing a claim of coercion under Section 94, what standard of proof must the court apply?

Q23: 23. If a person is coerced into committing a crime under threat of harm to a loved one, which defense can be asserted under Section 94?

Q24: 24. What is the overarching objective of Section 94 in the Indian Penal Code 1860?

Q25: 25. If a person is coerced into participating in a criminal conspiracy under threat of harm, which defense is applicable under Section 94?

Score Summary